A Day Late And A Dollar Short: Zepto Fixes Unit Economics, But What About Profitability?

A Day Late And A Dollar Short: Zepto Fixes Unit Economics, But What About Profitability?
A Day Late And A Dollar Short: Zepto Fixes Unit Economics, But What About Profitability?

Earlier this week, Zepto filed its updated draft red herring prospectus (UDRHP) with the market regulator SEBI. The startup intends to raise ₹8,010 Cr via a fresh issue. The IPO will comprise an offer for sale (OFS) of up to 11.35 Cr shares.

 As per its updated draft papers, its net loss climbed to ₹5,095 Cr in FY26 versus ₹4,697 Cr in FY25, but operating revenue almost doubled YoY to ₹22,624 Cr. 

On the surface, the numbers tell a tale of prioritising breakneck growth over profitability, but a deeper analysis reveals a more nuanced picture — one that shows that Zepto’s operating metrics are moving in the right direction. Several key unit economics indicators have improved over the past year, indicating that the startup is becoming more efficient with every order it is trying to fulfil. 

Adjusted EBITDA losses per order have narrowed, free cash flow burn per order has reduced and operating cash outflows have improved despite the startup’s continuous expansion. While profitability still feels like a distant dream, is it inching towards it? Let’s find out…

Zepto Improves Its Unit Economics

The quick commerce giant’s UDRHP reveals an improvement in its per-order economics. This, however, doesn’t mean that Zepto is no longer losing money while delivering orders. It is, but the burn has now reduced. 

The startup’s adjusted EBITDA loss per order improved from ₹136 in FY25 to ₹79 in FY26. During the same period, free cash flow burn per order has declined from ₹161 to ₹68. A combination of factors, including a high order density across mature markets, has led to this improvement. More orders helped the delivery startup absorb its fixed costs. Besides, a rapid growth of high-margin revenue streams, including advertising revenue, gave a boost to Zepto’s unit economics.

Zepto’s UDRHP further suggests it is extracting greater efficiency from its network than it was able to a year ago. This, however, does not mean that profitability is just around the corner.

The startup reported a free cash flow deficit of around ₹4,330 Cr, and operating cash flow continues to remain negative. This means that the startup continues to lose money, and profitability is still a distant dream. 

A Day Late And A Dollar Short: Zepto Fixes Unit Economics, But What About Profitability?

 

Zepto’s Biggest Bet Is Density

One of the biggest takeaways from the UDRHP is that its profitability thesis increasingly revolves around density rather than expansion. While a majority of quick commerce startups primarily focus on geographic expansion, Zepto is building dense clusters of dark stores within existing markets. The startup said this strategy enables shorter delivery distances, higher order throughput and lower fulfilment costs. 

During FY26, the startup expanded its dark store network to 1,139 dark stores across India. Rather than spreading itself thin across geographies, the startup has focused on increasing store density in urban clusters where demand is already strong. 

Hence, Zepto’s orders processed per day (OPD) per store increased 18.1% from 1,325 in FY24 to 1,565 in FY25 and further to 1,677 in FY26. More importantly, OPD per store jumped 50.2% from 1,425 in the quarter ended March 2025 to 2,140 in the quarter ended March 2026. This also shows how Zepto’s stores have become more productive over time. 

With an increase in order density, dark stores can process more orders without a proportional increase in operating expenses and with improved labour productivity and better infrastructure utilisation. 

Instead of prioritising 10-minute delivery, the startup is bundling orders within the same neighbourhood through a single delivery executive, thereby improving delivery efficiency and lowering per-delivery cost. This is reflected in the drop in Zepto’s supply chain variable cost per order, which dropped to ₹61.24 in Q4 FY26 from ₹63.2 in Q1 FY24. 

A Day Late And A Dollar Short: Zepto Fixes Unit Economics, But What About Profitability?

Advertising Emerging As New Growth Lever

Operational efficiency is just one side of the equation. One of the major reasons behind the startup’s improved unit economics is the emergence of a high-margin revenue business, which is advertising revenue. 

The startup made ₹1,636 Cr in FY26 ad revenue compared to a mere ₹49 Cr two years ago. Currently, advertising revenue accounts for almost 7.8% of the startup’s overall top line. As per its UDRHP, more than 2,400 brands have tapped into Zepto’s in-house advertising platform. 

Unlike the grocery delivery business, advertising is a low-cost but high-margin business. Beyond advertising, Zepto is also generating additional revenue through subscriptions, platform fees, and other ancillary services. Bundled together, these revenue streams are helping Zepto diversify its monetisation beyond grocery margins.

The Profitability Debate Is Not Over

Despite a clear improvement in unit economics, Zepto has failed to curtail its losses. The startup reported a free cash flow deficit of ₹4,330 Cr in FY26. Dark store additions, customer acquisition costs and operational investments continue to drag Zepto’s bottom line. 

As per its current cash reserves and FY26 cash burn levels, Zepto seems to have a runway of roughly 1.3 years. Zepto is also witnessing a drop in its annual transacting user base. The startup’s UDRHP revealed that its user base declined from 49.54 Mn in the December 2025 quarter to 47.97 Mn in the March 2026 quarter. 

Besides, competition remains another major challenge. Eternal-owned BlinkIt continues to remain way ahead of its peers, while Swiggy’s Instamart is trying to scale. Traditional ecommerce players such as Flipkart and Amazon’s entry into the quick commerce space further puts Zepto’s market share under stress.  

Another point to highlight is that while Zepto is stressing on doubling down on its major revenue-contributing cities, it would also need to spend capital on entering new markets. Now these new stores would take another 12 to 14 months to achieve breakeven, which will further drag down its bottom line. 

Zepto is currently in an interesting place. Its economics per order is improving, but it is doing only little to make it profitable.

Edited By Shishir Parasher
Creatives By Abhyam Gusai

The post A Day Late And A Dollar Short: Zepto Fixes Unit Economics, But What About Profitability? appeared first on Inc42 Media.